yourmumsdomain.com

christ, we actually bought finnan!?

Stevie Finnan was quite good when he played for Fulham.

End of the day, if your a Chelsea fan your currently having no complaints with whats going on, where as other clubs fans may be some what peeve'd.

Thats football.

parmo wrote:

Calix wrote:End of the day Chelsea are a nothing club with no history, be it of winning anything, of great players, nothing. Will always be known as the club who were the equivalent of Norwich City ever until bought by a Russian billionaire.

ouch that is a cutting statment

as much as i fucking detest everthing about chelsea due to the great rows my club( middlesbrough ) has had with them ( small club large club mentality) i would never class them as a norwich or similar with no history

I think it's an insult to Norwich, I would have picked another club..like Bolton.

and steve finnan is a good player!

and just because it isnt our recent histroy that is great, our club has a perfectly good history thankyou, including winning the league (1955, would have been first english club in european club but fa were gay and delayed it a year) and winning various other major trophies threw the years, fa cup (70/97/2000), league cup (65/98), cup winners cup (71/98), super cup (98) all pre roman. the club is 100 years old this year, many great england internationals are born chelsea youth players threw the years, the like of greaves, wilkins and more.

i take offense that just because my club hasnt the great history of liverpool or man utd, that you have a worse opinion of the club. to me that is shameful and shows you for some sort of glory supporter. im chelsea threw and threw, i stood in the freezing rain in 94 and watched us lose 1-0 to everton in fa cup 3rd round (i think~) and still remember singing my little voice out. i remember the crap of the last 15 years and the greats like franco (genious?) and the hoddle days.

comparing oil (legal duh) to cocaine is also fucking retarded. seriously get out ur own ass pain and see that blaming the money is the easy way to blame your own clubs shortcomings.

id support chelsea if we were relatgated this season and for the next 5 years im a true fan and always will be.

maybe we dont have a great history but i think its downright offensive to say we have no history and basically till this point iv read every post with interest, but uv just proved what a retard you really are.

This one time I went down the pub and there was some football on the TV.

Could be worse, you could buy Peter Crouch.

Worst. Signing. Ever.

Angus wrote:Could be worse, you could buy Peter Crouch.

Worst. Signing. Ever.

Diego Forlan!

Cyric will say crouch is a legend, time will tell

Crouchy is God.

Mercury wrote:our club has a perfectly good history thankyou, including winning the league (1955, would have been first english club in european club but fa were gay and delayed it a year) and winning various other major trophies threw the years, fa cup (70/97/2000), league cup (65/98), cup winners cup (71/98), super cup (98) all pre roman

Is this a joke?
Countless clubs have won the league from the 30s, 40s or 50s. I don't know if I'd even count the 50s as a proper decade for football since it followed such a horrible war that killed a large amount of the male population.

im chelsea threw and threw, i stood in the freezing rain in 94 and watched us lose 1-0 to everton in fa cup 3rd round

If your club was bigger you'd have overhead protection from the rain at your ground, like Anfield or Old Trafford. After all, rain can't go threw solid objects.

Mercury wrote:
i take offense that just because my club hasnt the great history of liverpool or man utd, that you have a worse opinion of the club. to me that is shameful and shows you for some sort of glory supporter.

You're such a dumbfuck, explain that argument, or at least try to understand the context you're trying to make an educated post about.

Oh and considering you're not bright enough to understand what I meant/can't read, lets take the argument to your context:

Blackpool have won the cup, fucking Preston have won the League. Sorry, how is Chelsea any better than either of them?

Manchester United didn't win the league for 26 years, but still had the highest attendances and biggest support in the country throughout that time. Ofc that's glory hunting though!
Liverpool supporters have had to watch complete shit for 10 years, but still filled their ground every week. What fucking glory hunters.

As you would say "uve just proved wot a retard u really are"

When Chelsea were shit? Weren't you playing in front of 20k throughout the 80s and 90s? You can't fucking win this argument man, every statistic points to Chelsea being a nothing club, with fickle, glory hunting rent boy cunts for supporters.

Oh look, i'm right:

http://www.european-football-statistics ... eeng80.htm

http://www.european-football-statistics ... eeng92.htm

It's the same for every year, I just linked some random ones.

if ud actually looked at those links, its for top flight only, and we werent even in the top flight for half those seasons, wen we are we are in the top 8 with 20,000+ a week. top 8. attendances at football stadiums have increased 10 fold since the 80s, look at man utds, they may be top with roughly 40k each week, but now they sell 70k, nearly a 100% increase in support. chelsea sell out 38k a week, and used to sell 20k, another nr 100% increase in support. dont get me wrong there are enough glory fans out there, but to write off the hardcore supporter as a "glory hunting rent boy cunt" just because our history isnt great...shameful tbh. and just as bad as roman buying chelsea, with your attitude only manu liverpool aresenal everton and spurs would ever win ther league again.

Football has been a game controlled by cash for a long time, thats why everyone loves seeing the 'millionaire playboys' get soddomised on rare occasions by non-league or lower league teams.

Chelsea might have raised the amount of cash needed to compete, but lets be honest that didn't happen overnight - some of the other big clubs in the world are simply reaping what they have been sowing for for the last 30 or 40 years. Or else 'nothing clubs' like Preston or Blackpool would actually be able to compete.

Diego Forlan is teh sex.
2nd top scorer in Spain last year = love.

And who cares, Liverpool were good like what, 20 years ago? Stop hanging on, your crap now :<

Spurs 4 teh win.

Mercury wrote:if ud actually looked at those links, its for top flight only, and we werent even in the top flight for half those seasons, wen we are we are in the top 8 with 20,000+ a week. top 8. attendances at football stadiums have increased 10 fold since the 80s, look at man utds, they may be top with roughly 40k each week, but now they sell 70k, nearly a 100% increase in support. chelsea sell out 38k a week, and used to sell 20k, another nr 100% increase in support. dont get me wrong there are enough glory fans out there, but to write off the hardcore supporter as a "glory hunting rent boy cunt" just because our history isnt great...shameful tbh. and just as bad as roman buying chelsea, with your attitude only manu liverpool aresenal everton and spurs would ever win ther league again.

man utd have a bigger stadium now. Liverpool's attendances back then are about the same as they are now, full capacity crowd, and that's considering we won everything in sight then and aren't close to the league title now.
Naming Chelsea for what they are is just as bad as roman buying the club with his blood money and turning it from nothing into a title contender overnight? You dumb fuck (hate resorting to personal insults in a discussion on football but you started it). I'm sure chelsea has some 'hardcore' supporters, maybe there is more than only you, but you can't even fill your ground for every game with that fat russian lol! Let alone before it.

Chelsea are just about the most detestable club, it's like god created them for everyone else to hate. The only history your club has is it's involvement with total cunts. What about Bates?? Buys the club for a pound, then pretty much destroys the older support base, I don't want to go on about this man but he's the biggest shit in football period. Then it's Roman the thieving russian and Peter Kenyon the ultimate snivelling little arsewipe rat. So this is 3 cunts who have controlled your club, that's more than you've won league titles

And how many times were Chelsea even in Europe before they made the rule to extend European entry to the top 4. How many times in your entire clubs history before that point were Chelsea in Europe?