Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 3:15 pm
Artifakt!
yourmumsdomain.com
PKing since 1893
http://griefed.net/forum/
@ archer mages, dryad fags, ninja nubs, wand tards etc
Page 3 of 3
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 3:40 pm
Need to get rid of that Benn chap as well.
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 4:05 pm
RMC have their Ninjas.
EK have GEEKNOOB
and -+- have Belomor
Every decent guild has at least one embarrasing person.
I don't have a problem with -+- , in fact I actually like them as a guild, but one has to wonder why they have possibly the second biggest skilless lamer on the shard in their ranks.
EK have GEEKNOOB
and -+- have Belomor
Every decent guild has at least one embarrasing person.
I don't have a problem with -+- , in fact I actually like them as a guild, but one has to wonder why they have possibly the second biggest skilless lamer on the shard in their ranks.
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 4:12 pm
Who is I-C's villa?~
*controversy*
*controversy*
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 4:30 pm
Fixed.Nixon wrote:Who is I-C's, villa?~
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 4:37 pm
LOL, abuse admin powers more.
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 4:37 pm
The point with wands is that they shouldn't be used one on one, for surviving ganks I fully support them. Whilst some may consider me to be a gank, I still dont approve of their use against me.ShinDhara wrote:weeeeeee!
Again i have to say that Belo isnt really a -+- .
He and another Russian got a Char in it for doing spawns together. He isnt really a part of our guild community.
and i dont like wands, too and i just dont use it like others do.
I see Belo and Evil use them, you guys use em too, i dont care about this ^^
Best thing would be a total "fix" on this..i dont like to see a guy running away low on HPs wheether in a gank or not, whether a guildmate of mine or an "enemy" its just Zzzzzzzz....
COME ON OSI/EA letz throw this shit aboard!
Cheers@ Zum Zim...
p.s. it's Zim Zum
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:14 pm
Calas Thunder dropped archery.
ROFL more ?
The pathetic cunt obviously couldn't handle the loss of his bug abusing moving shot/armour ignores for the win, so changed his weapon skill.
Gogo @ you loser who was saying how the change wouldn't affect him.
KK, so thats one wanker down, several more to go.
Lets see who will be the next to change their templates because they were only suceeding up until now due to exploitation of game mechanics, or exploiting an oversight from OSI.
Calas obviously was too scared he wouldn't be able to compete without his armour ignores on the move, and others will no doubt follow suit.
Owned ?
ROFL more ?
The pathetic cunt obviously couldn't handle the loss of his bug abusing moving shot/armour ignores for the win, so changed his weapon skill.
Gogo @ you loser who was saying how the change wouldn't affect him.
KK, so thats one wanker down, several more to go.
Lets see who will be the next to change their templates because they were only suceeding up until now due to exploitation of game mechanics, or exploiting an oversight from OSI.
Calas obviously was too scared he wouldn't be able to compete without his armour ignores on the move, and others will no doubt follow suit.
Owned ?
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:25 pm
calas claims he is even more deadly with swords
I quaked
I quaked
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:38 pm
Bah, someone told Calas I called him a nasty word starting with "c" on this forum, so he came looking for me at brit gate and kirred me with his shiny new ubws spear 
me = owned, but it was funny.
me = owned, but it was funny.